Skip to content

Case study

Case resolution went from 4 to 5 days to under a day, on an implementation that took six weeks

A mutual insurance company's contractor resource center manages 2,000 contractors and an annual spend of $100 to $150 million. It was running that on a shared Outlook mailbox. After moving to Dovetail, case resolution fell from 4 to 5 days to under a day.

The organization

Industry
Insurance
Function
Contractor Resource Center, reporting to the Director of Enterprise Procurement
Contractors managed
2,000
Annual spend
$100 to $150 million
Previous system
A shared Outlook mailbox
Using
Dovetail HR Case Management

What changed

  • Under a day

    Case resolution time, down from 4 to 5 days

  • ~6 weeks

    Actual implementation, against an 8 to 10 week estimate

  • 1,000 minutes

    Productivity reclaimed per month by filtering around 500 redundant notifications

  • Same day

    Contractor onboarding requests now processed on receipt rather than days later

Figures as published in the case study. Quotes from the Contractor Resource Center Manager. The customer is not named in the published case study.

The challenge

A shared inbox running a $150 million function

The contractor resource center managed 2,000 contractors and an annual spend of $100 to $150 million through a shared Outlook mailbox. Four problems came with it:

  • The shared mailbox built up unread email, often reaching 150 at any given time, and the team could not track requests reliably.
  • Managing cases through email was prone to human error, so cases slipped and mistakes were made around contractor hiring.
  • Individual workloads were invisible, so the manager could not allocate resource properly.
  • The team was consumed by tactical work, leaving no time for anything strategic.

The manager approached a colleague running HR shared services, whose team had a reputation for responsive service, and found they were using Dovetail. After a demonstration from that colleague, he acquired it for the contractor resource center.

What I liked most about the implementation was how easy it was. I had come from a spot where I don't want to say I was jaded, but we had had a really bad system implementation right before doing this. They said it was supposed to take 14 weeks and it took over a year. So when we heard that this was going to take 8 to 10 weeks, in my mind, that was already like 'All right. It will probably take 6 to 8 months. But it actually took around 6 weeks to implement Dovetail! Overall, Dovetail was one of the easiest system implementations I've been a part of.

Contractor Resource Center ManagerLeading mutual insurance company

~6 weeks

actual implementation time

Implementation

Against a bad previous experience

The team came to this implementation carrying the memory of the last one, a system quoted at 14 weeks that took over a year. When Dovetail was quoted at 8 to 10 weeks, the manager privately assumed 6 to 8 months.

It took around six weeks.

Since switching to Dovetail, our productivity has greatly improved. Each team member now has their own queue profile, streamlining communication and making our workflow more efficient. We filtered out unnecessary notifications, saving about 500 messages per month and reclaiming 1,000 minutes of productivity. We are now able to resolve cases in under a day.

Contractor Resource Center ManagerLeading mutual insurance company

The results

Where the time went

Individual queues replaced the shared inbox. Each team member has their own queue profile and assigns their name to specific cases, so everyone can see who is working on what. Duplication and confusion stopped.

Notification analysis. Reviewing what the team was actually receiving showed a large volume of redundant notifications. Removing them saved around 500 messages a month and reclaimed roughly 1,000 minutes of productivity.

Resolution time. Case resolution moved from 4 to 5 days to under a day. It was a gradual improvement, since the team had a backlog to work through in the first months.

Onboarding. Notice of a new contractor's start date used to arrive by email and get missed, so the team often learned of it days late and onboarding slipped. Requests are now received and processed promptly, often the same day.

Workload visibility and reporting. Cases are tracked and categorized by type, with onboarding the most common, then change and offboarding requests, plus report and billing queries. The manager pulls a report in the first week of each month covering case volume, case types and how much work each team member is carrying, and keeps a running total to identify seasonal patterns such as offboarding rising in December. Before the reporting tool, work volume could not be predicted.

Resource allocation. Five metrics on open and closed cases and case types go to the Director of Enterprise Procurement, and are used to allocate people across projects and identify cross training opportunities, including lending a team member to vendor management during a quiet period rather than hiring.

Take it with you

Download this case study as a PDF

The full write up in a single document, for sharing with the people who are not on this page. Same content, formatted to circulate.

  • Every figure sourced, nothing rounded up
  • Formatted for an internal business case
  • No obligation, no follow up sequence

See it against your own process

Bring a real inquiry type your team handles today and we will walk it through the system end to end.